If the platform ‘”masters” – forgive me, God, for the expression’ already treat people, books and knowledge as raw material. and THAT, in a broader interpretation, would mean this: companies that present themselves as drivers of innovation must be credibly accused of treating science, books, journalism, music and art as raw material to be collected, absorbed and monetised without consent, compensation or democratic accountability. It would be nice to remind them that throughout the world – which is neoliberal, if we measure it by its own principles – raw materials are paid for everywhere, starting with wood, plastic, ore, water, etc. That all of this is paid for, except for what is more valuable, which is scientific and artistic expression and reaction. In the event that artists, scientists and creators were to stop feeding the platforms and now the AI temples, they would be left without their raw material – and in the end, they could only produce fog. Secondly, since people – or rather, us – are treated as a resource, it is important to remind them that workers are paid everywhere in the world – that is to say, they work for a wage, with the exception of social media users (of the platform temples), and AI-generated platforms – so it would be nice to pay the workers, that is, the users who feed, query and spend more than eight hours a day on these new temples. So, the answer should be, in the near future, to pay the workers (i.e., the users of social networks and AI tools), and secondly, to pay for the raw material – rather than stealing it or using it without permission and treating it as “waste”. . That would be necessary to do for a start, and then – regarding the religious elements and attempts to imitate religiosity, as well as the ecological state, which could lead to a cataclysm – I will address that at a later date.